I noticed today that the framework that has completely covered the Washington Monument for the last few months has been dismantled at the top, and you can now see the pyramidion. Hopefully, that means that the repairs are getting close to completion.
Thirty-Six Years: Building the Washington Monument
Thirty-Six Years
The building of the Washington Monument took 36 years from the laying of the cornerstone on July 4, 1848 to the setting of the capstone on December 6, 1884. Come explore the details of the construction of America's most famous monument, and learn how the construction was impacted by the political and social upheaval of the Civil War.
Post Earthquake Repairs
The Washington Monument has been closed to the public since the earthquake in August 2011, and the park service says that it will stay closed until needed repairs are complete. They recently erected scaffolding that rises almost to the level of the initial construction that halted in the mid-1850's, close to 150 feet, apparently to work on the facing stones near the base of the obelisk.
I noticed the scaffolding about a week ago. I didn't see any press releases that describe the work that is being done and there isn't anything specific on the park service's Washington Monument website, but I'm pretty sure that if you took the time to visit the monument, there would be somebody there to answer questions about it. I didn't have time this morning, I had just enough time to take the photo.
I noticed the scaffolding about a week ago. I didn't see any press releases that describe the work that is being done and there isn't anything specific on the park service's Washington Monument website, but I'm pretty sure that if you took the time to visit the monument, there would be somebody there to answer questions about it. I didn't have time this morning, I had just enough time to take the photo.
Construction of the Monument Begins Again
As the Centennial Celebration approached, members of congress and others began to realize that the unfinished obelisk really was an eyesore. Something needed to be done. Of course, we're still talking about Washington, D.C. so that something that needed doing wouldn't happen without a lot of discussion, argument and bickering...
This post will cover the last twelve years of the Monument's construction. If you haven't seen the entries for the years between 1848 and 1872, just scroll down.
This post will cover the last twelve years of the Monument's construction. If you haven't seen the entries for the years between 1848 and 1872, just scroll down.
1873
In January, the House of
Representatives appointed a committee to confer with the Society on what would
be required to complete the monument in time for the centennial celebration in
July 1876. Within a month, the committee reported that “This rich and massive
shaft, though simple and plain, would be a noble monument, worthy of the
sublime character which it is designed to testify.” Not everyone agreed; a
local newspaper called it, “a wretched design, a wretched location and an
insecure foundation.”
In February, First Lieutenant
William Marshall, US Army Corps of Engineers, assigned to conduct a brief
inspection of the monument’s foundation, reported:
“My examination has failed to show any important changes to
the condition of the shaft since that time [of the last inspection in 1859,
when the Corps of Engineers assigned Lt. Joseph Ives to inspect the
foundation]. The masonry of the foundation courses is rubble of blue gneiss.
The blocks are generally large and the work, for this class of masonry, good.” He didn’t observe any evidence of significant
changes or settling of the long neglected monument, though admittedly he only
spent a very few days on his investigation before he made his report. He
reviewed the record of inspection that Joseph Ives had made before the war, and
agreed that “all questions as to the stability of the shaft itself have been
answered by Lieutenant Ives, in whose conclusions I agree.”
The committee recommended that
congress grant $200,000 to the society so that work could commence on
completion of the shaft and construction of a terrace around the base of the
monument, but congress completed their session before they voted on the bill.
1874
“The monument affairs stand as
usual, ‘masterly inactivity’ the order of the day. Nothing can be done or
attempted in the way of proposed Congressional Cooperation until Lieutenant
Marshall’s report be made, and then only if favorable.” Letter from John
Carroll Brent and L.B. Smith, Baltimore MD.
This letter referred to Marshall’s second assignment, to conduct a longer,
more comprehensive inspection of the monument and the foundation. When his
second task was complete, he reported again that the monument was secure, but
that the foundation was too small. He recommended a maximum height of only 400
feet; a 600-foot structure would cause “excessive pressure upon a soil not
wholly incompressible.” He also made recommendations concerning the thicknesses
of the walls of the shaft to reduce the overall weight, as well as a
combination of brick wall tops and a roof made of cast-iron plates rather than
stone.
The Corps of Engineers
forwarded Lieutenant Marshall’s second report to the Board of Engineers for
Fortification in New York City. This group of senior engineers and general
officers did not travel to the site, but noted that Marshall reported that the
earth under the foundation was subjected to nearly 5 tons per square foot at
the monument’s current, unfinished height. They calculated that raising the
monument to 400 feet would increase the load to the earth by more than an
additional third, which they thought would be far too much for safety. “We
could not…with the information before us, recommend that any additional
pressure should be thrown on the site of the Washington Monument.”
It became clear to all that,
despite the patriotic efforts and desires, the monument to the Father of the
Country would not be complete in time for the Centennial.
“It is a constant mortification
to the people of the United States when they come to this city to see that
mutilated monument about which so much has been said, and so patriotically,
this evening. I hope something will be done to rescue that monument from its
present condition, although I fear that it is now the symbol of the condition
of our government.” - The Honorable
Samuel S. Cox, Representative from the Commonwealth of Virginia, speaking to
the assembled House in June.
In the fall elections, the
Democrats regained the House of Representatives for the first time since 1860.
The tide was now moving strongly against the Radical Republicans. 1874 also
marked the return to power by the Democrats in the state governments of
Alabama, Arkansas, and Texas; there were now seven southern states that had
been “redeemed” or returned to the control of the white conservatives.
1875
In July, Edward Clark, the
Commissioner of Public Buildings and Grounds, wrote to the Society. His letter
ended thusly: “…in conclusion, I will state that the present appearance of the
Monument and its surrounding are likely to repel visitors; but, if the grounds
are cleared of these old and unsightly objects, they will be attracted to the
monument and its museum…”
The Society took his advice.
The next month, an advertisement appeared in the Washington Chronicle, Evening
Star and the National Republican:
“On Tuesday, August 24th 1875
at 11 o’clock A. M. at the monument grounds, I will sell a large lot of wrought
and cast iron, wood pickets, fence posts, lot of wood, sash, blinds, door
frames, slats etc. etc. also one horse. At the same time and place several
wooden buildings, large lot of marble and gneiss stone, engine and boiler
machinery etc. etc. Terms Cash.” They
made about $1500 after the cost of advertising and the commission for the
auctioneer.
The Civil Rights Act of 1875
was passed, preventing discrimination in public accommodations. It was the
first effort by the legislature to stem segregation by states and companies
that provided services to the public. It was largely a symbolic gesture and
rarely enforced, particularly after federal troops were removed from the
southern states. The Act would be declared unconstitutional eight years later
by the Supreme Court, who declared that the state did not have the power to
prevent individuals from discriminating.
1876
On April 5th, the Virginia
Marble Company in Loudoun County, which was within 12 miles of the W & O
Rail Line, offered enough marble to complete the monument for free, if the Society
would pay for quarrying and shipping.
By this point, everybody that
had an interest in seeing through the completion of the monument; the public,
Congress and the Society itself, had reached the conclusion that, whatever else
was done, the part of the monument that had been completed would remain intact
and be incorporated into the final structure. “…all idea of surrendering the
character of the Monument or allowing the structure, as far as completed, to be
taken down, should be positively and emphatically disavowed.” This conclusion would bring its own
significant challenges to the men chosen to complete the memorial, but
sentiment was very strong that there was an obligation to the people who had
contributed to the effort over the many years, either with their cash or their
sweat or both, that must be met.
Despite the delay and
additional controversy that the Fortification Board’s dire warning produced,
congress approved a $200,000 donation to the Memorial Society for the
resumption of construction of the Washington Memorial. The act that provided
these funds stipulated that the Society must surrender all rights and property
to the federal government, but would remain in place to advise and solicit
donations for the continued construction efforts. A Joint Commission was
established; chaired by the President, the Commission membership included the
Supervising Architect of the Treasury, the Architect of the Capitol, Chief
Engineer of the Army and the First Vice President of the Washington National
Monument Society. The act also required yet another evaluation of the
foundation, by a new board of officers of the Corps of Engineers, who
dispatched Second Lieutenant Dan Kingman to conduct the latest foundation
inspection.
In September, the Corps of
Engineers Board of Officers reported:
“1. That the stratum of sand and clay upon which the monument
rests is already loaded to the limit of prudence if not, indeed, to the limit
of safety…
2. That additional weight imposed at the top of the structure
would in all probability cause additional and possibly extensive spalling and
splitting in the ashlar facing near the base.
3. It is evident that the masonry foundation was not given
spread enough to carry safely the weight it was designed to place upon it.
4. There has been actual compression of the soil to the
extent of eight to nine inches, the shaft is sensibly out of plumb and the
foundation courses show increasing departure from horizontality.” (This last observation was based upon an
erroneous sighting done from the wrong bench mark; the board later conceded the
mistake, but stood firm in their contention that the foundation was inadequate
as it currently stood.)
The board concluded with their
concept of what the finished monument would be and what it would represent:
“It is a great, bare obelisk, plain to severity, a conception
perhaps most suitable to symbolize the great character it would commemorate…for
these very reasons, exacting in all its parts, and particularly in its
foundation, all the perfection of elements and details that can be given to its
material and workmanship. The stones which compose the foundation should be
strong and perfect, truly shaped and accurately placed together. There should
be no yielding of the parts, and no disturbance of the levels. Upon such a
foundation, a monument could be reared fit to commemorate Washington, and
worthy of the nation of whose foundations he was the chief master builder.”
This report from the board
caused significant angst among the members of the Society. They felt that the
report contained significant errors (particularly the erroneous eight or nine
inches of soil compression that was found to be a mistake) and served only to
further put off the long-delayed resumption of construction. The Society
members felt, perhaps justifiably so, that the critics of Mills’ plan for the
monument had merely cast around to find fault with something, anything, about
the memorial; since attacking the design hadn’t worked and then criticizing the
site didn’t work, they fell to saying the foundation wouldn’t support the
memorial, and thus everything should be torn down and the project started
completely from zero again.
The Society wrote, in part:
“…The great scientific attainments of this last examining board will not be
questioned and it would be an insult to suggest a doubt as to their fitness to
perform the duty assigned to them, and their strict integrity in rendering a
report of the result of their examination. But, Men of Science, of practical
knowledge, of vast experience in such matters not biased in any way are of the
opinion that the Army Examining Board have made a mistake…”
C. Seymour Dutton, one of the
original competing architects who submitted proposals for the Monument’s
design, was less diplomatic: “…Now while the worthlessness of the report in
question has been abundantly shown…on the other hand, the absolute safety of
the foundation has not been positively proved…I feel a deep personal interest
in the completion of this monument upon the original design of a simple shaft
and as I am unable from a professional point of view to see any serious
practical difficulty in its way, allow me to sincerely express the hope that
you may speedily be able to overcome all technical obstruction and proceed with
the work…”
Rutherford B. Hayes was elected
President in an extremely narrow (in fact, he lost the popular vote to Democrat
Samuel Tilden) and controversial election. The controversy centered around what
became known the Compromise of 1877, in which the Democrat-controlled House
accepted the results of the Electoral College, giving Hayes the presidency, in
return for the complete removal of the remaining federal troops from the South.
1877
The scathing letter from C.
Seymour Dutton concerning the monument foundation wasn’t the only one:
“D. Sir, Three Generals were appointed to examine the
strength of the foundation of the monument. Two lieutenants report on the same;
one favorably, one adversely.
Well do I remember 40 years since, when a boy in Missouri,
having contributed one dollar towards the erection of the structure, and have
earnestly watched its progress ever since as occasion has called me to this
city. Lt Marshall says that one corner is 1 6/10” out of line at the top. Admit
it, what difference does it make? It is still far within the center of gravity
and is a matter of no moment. [Pun not intended, one assumes]
The foundation must be of the very best to have sustained the
present weight for twenty-five years. It is doubtful if the generals could do
as well today.
But again you owe it to the original
subscribers to stick to the original plan, and as one Lieutenant is as good as
another, to have a third part on the commission whose decision shall be final,
we do not wish the monument stopped on a tie.
Respectfully, Charles Wiggins.”
In October, after months of
conflict between the Society, whose members were convinced that the foundation
was secure, and the Engineers’ Board, the Joint Congressional Commission
concluded in their report to Congress: “It must be assumed that the foundation
is insufficient to sustain the weight of the completed structure.” Congress
agreed with their conclusion.
In the South, President Hayes
withdrew federal troops, as he had promised, and restored home rule to states
that had rebelled. The Era of Reconstruction was officially over; the Radicals
had failed in their bid to rebuild the South in their vision. Segregation and
inequality, as well as violence and fear, would reign in the South for
generations before the civil rights movement of the 1950’s and 60’s would
finally see concrete gains in the fight for equal rights for blacks.
1878
On June 14, authority by
Congress was granted to strengthen the foundation of the Monument. Just to
recap the years of conflict on this issue: Not counting the inspection done by
Lieutenant Ives back just before the war (although his inspection and calculations
were often referred to by later inspectors), there were at least four separate
inspections of the unfinished shaft and the foundation over a period of five
years. Additionally there were several scholarly reviews of the findings of
those inspections, the latest being from the Engineers’ Board. There were also
the many meetings, debates and exchanges of letters between the Society (the
majority of whom at least were convinced that the foundation was sound and
sufficient and that the many inspections and reviews were simply bureaucratic
can-kicking), the Joint Congressional Commission (some members of which it
seemed clear were looking for ways to delay the project), and the many private
citizens who held some special interest in the monument and a desire to see it
completed.
For example, in June Larkin G.
Mead, the sculptor who designed and built Lincoln's tomb, wrote to the
commission with suggestions for depictions of Washington’s life. The
suggestions included Mead's own four bas-reliefs: Washington taking command as
Commander-in-Chief at Cambridge; The Surrender of Cornwallis; Washington
resigning his commission; and the Inauguration of Washington as the first
president. Eight statues he suggested: a Marion Dragoon, a Morgan Rifleman, a
Valley Forge man, a Minuteman, a Green Mountain Boy, a Privateersman, a
Frontiersman, and an Indian. Finally, he listed eight panels: War, Peace,
Religion, Education, Commerce, Agriculture, Science, and Art; and a scene from
Washington’s early life: “Braddock’s Surrender”. Mead's letter is illustrative of a couple of
things: one, people at the time were very familiar with the many outstanding
examples of George Washington’s selfless and superlative service to his
country; and two, it would have been nearly impossible to capture all of those
contributions and achievements in a single memorial.
On June 25th, Army HQ Special
Order 136 appointed Lt. Colonel Thomas Casey, US Army Corps of Engineers to
complete the Washington Monument. Captain George Davis was assigned as his
assistant.
In late July, Casey presented
extensive plans to the Joint Commission for raising the monument to 525 feet
using marble with iron fasteners. These plans included extensive detail on the
underpinning of the old foundation.
In a letter dated August 1st,
Robert C. Winthrop argued again for a simple obelisk (as opposed to the
original design): “…I fall back on the
simple shaft as at least not inferior to any of them in effect and as free from
tinsel or tawdry.”
Casey’s notes from the fall include
lots of construction activity (to prepare for work on the foundation
apparently) but no mention of final plans. He does talk of bringing in miners
from Baltimore for work on the foundation.
On October 1st, Casey’s plan
for strengthening the foundation was approved. It would both underpin and
extend the bottom surface of the foundation. It would take the foundation from
its current depth to another 12 feet below the bottom of the original, almost
to the level of the water table. The new foundation would extend out 18 feet
beyond the old; making the outer edges of the new mass over 23 feet long on an
edge. Three buttresses on each side would hold the old and the new foundations
together.
When the monument was finished
(Casey was, at this point, calculating for a 525 foot height), the total weight
would be over eighty thousand tons, which translates to a pressure of just over 5 tons per square foot for the soil
and rock under the foundation, very close to the pressure that the unfinished
obelisk placed on the original foundation.
He determined that the work to
underpin the unfinished monument that weighed somewhere close to 32,000 tons,
“evidently a delicate operation”, could succeed by “introducing the masonry in
thin, vertical layers.” He would tunnel
under the original foundation in drifts that were no more than four feet wide,
and then fill those drifts with Portland cement concrete. Dowel stones set into
the face of the succeeding concrete slabs, along with alternating wider and
narrower sections of each slab, which would help hold the layers together and
create a strong bulk for the monument to rest upon.
When Casey’s plan was approved,
Congress appropriated $36,000 for improving the foundation. Casey calculated
that the work would cost just over $99,000 to complete. His plan was approved,
and he was directed to begin work on the first of October, but he was
specifically ordered not to exceed the $36,000 limit that had been set.
There was much to be done. The
monument grounds had been seriously neglected, the only work for years had been
to clean up and dispose of some of the more unsightly junk laying around. Casey
had to procure materials, tools, and machinery, and he had to recruit and hire
a crew of workers. He made specific mention of his desire to find men that were
skilled in tunneling and mining work, and he went to Baltimore to find many of
them. Carpenters, blacksmiths and stoneworkers were also needed. A new road to
the site had to be put down that connected to 14th Street and rails laid for
connection to allow deliveries from the rail depot. When the direction to begin work came, Casey
had 44 men working for him, including a mason, three stonecutters, two
carpenters, drillers, riggers, laborers and a night watchman. By the end of the
year, as work fully got underway, his workforce had more than doubled.
As Casey began his work on the
foundation, it’s interesting to remember that, though the foundation was and is
critically important to the monument, it was and is mostly unseen and thus not a
concern of most of the people that had an interest in the monument. They were
interested in the part that could be seen, and “interested” doesn’t begin to
touch the emotion that people held on the subject of the design of the
Washington Monument.
There were very few people at
that time who thought that a simple, unadorned Egyptian-style obelisk was a
suitable style for a memorial for George Washington. The Victorian aesthetic,
which put high artistic value in “all that was intricate, irregular and complex”,
rebelled completely against the austere, plain spike that was now being
planned. Henry van Brunt, a well-respected critic and a proponent of Victorian
architecture, wrote, “No person interested in our reputation as a civilized
people can contemplate this completion without pain.”
Many designs were offered that
met this thirst for Victorian complexity. One design in particular, from
William Story, an architect that worked and lived in Italy, was especially well
received, particularly from Story’s friends in Congress. It was ornate and far
different than the Mills design but it did incorporate the unfinished stump,
and because of that fact, Story’s supporters argued that it would meet the
obligation to the original Society of not abandoning the original conception of
the memorial.
As late as December of that
year, the Society itself was still torn as to what direction the renewed
construction should take, and they were apparently at some odds with the Joint
Congressional Commission. An extract from the Society’s proceedings dated the
17th of December of that year:
“Whereas the Washington National Monument Society have seen
and carefully examined the plan of the monument prepared by Mr. W. W. Story at
the instance of members of Congress of the Committees on Public Buildings and
Grounds of the Senate and the House of Representatives and regard it as vastly
superior in artistic taste and beauty of design to any other modification of
the original plan that has been suggested and whereas the proposed plan does not
involve the necessity of taking down the work that has been done, or the
dangerous operation of underpinning the foundation and will obviate objections
that have been urged against the original plan, and it is believed will
harmonize conflicting opinions and give general satisfaction to the country.
Therefore Resolved that the Society do hereby approve Mr.
Story’s proposed modification, subject to such minor modifications as may be
suggested in the construction. Resolved further that a committee of five (5)
members of which our presiding officer be chairman, be appointed to confer with
the said committees in regard to the further prosecution of the work.”
The Society later issued a
resolution backing away from their approval of the Story plan, citing the
apparent confusion and miscommunication with the Commission, who were obviously
(since they were providing the funds) the ones who were in charge of the
construction.
Thomas Casey was also thinking
about the monument as he worked on the foundation. The commission had directed
him to plan for a new height of 525 feet. He planned to use masonry up to the
500 foot mark and then “to crown the shaft with a pyramidal roof of iron, which
shall be 25 feet in height. This roof can be covered with hammered glass over
some portions, to give light to the well of the monument.” He planned for the
marble and stone shell of the monument to be vertical on the inside of the
structure, with a thickness of nearly 9 feet at the bottom, tapering to 18
inches at the top. He calculated that the final weight of the finished
monument, with its 30 ton iron roof, would be 43, 671 tons.
As Casey worked to strengthen
the foundation, the debate on the design of the visible part of the monument
continued in Congress for more than a year.
1879
Work on the foundation
continued into the summer, when it became delayed due to a lack of Portland
cement. Deliveries from J.B. White & Bros. were curtailed due to a
longshoremen strike. Casey had received from Congress additional funds for the foundation
work that brought the total up to $64,000, still far short of his estimate of
$99,000.
Though cement made with burnt
lime had been used in ancient times on Roman roads and aqueducts, Portland
cement was still a relatively new technology at this time. Named after the Isle
of Portland off the coast of Dorset, England, the formula and technique for
producing Portland cement was originally patented in 1824 by a mason from
Leeds, and a cheaper and superior product was developed in the 1830’s in England.
Though Portland cement was exported from England to the U.S. from that time, it
wasn’t manufactured in America until the 1870’s. Thomas Casey contracted his cement through
the New York office of J.B.White and Brothers, a British firm that shipped the cement
from their factory in Swanscombe. He reported difficulties in receiving
shipments of cement many times; events like longshoremen strikes forced him to
delay work, furlough workers and change his plans, but his perseverance and
management skills allowed him to see the work completed.
In October, Casey
reported: “During the month, the
excavation into the old blue stone foundation for the central buttresses on
each of the four faces was completed and the buttresses built of Portland
cement concrete. The mixture of the concrete used in the buttresses was as
follows: 1 bbl. cement, 1 ½ bbl. sand, 2 ¼ bbl. pebbles, and 3 bbl. broken
stone. This concrete is much stronger than that used in the slab under the old
foundation…The quantity of such excavation in the four buttresses was some 348
cubic yards while the quantity of concrete in the buttresses is some 530 cubic
yards…
Casey’s mention that the
buttresses were stronger than the slab refers to the fact that in the slab, he
used a mixture with more sand, pebbles and crushed rock, and less Portland
cement. The final section of this book is an Appendix which more fully explains
the details of the new foundation and contains a rough illustration of the old
and new parts of the foundation.
Casey also began excavation
into the blue stone foundation beneath the floor of the monument to obtain a
space for the winding drum of the elevator, and that work was completed during October.
"This excavation was some 18 feet square and 8 feet deep, requiring the
removal of 96 cubic yards of masonry. The floor of this pit was cemented and
leveled off and the four blocks to carry the bottom of the elevator drums put
in place…Three cuts were all that remained to complete the slab under the old
foundation… the slab is 126 ft 6 in square, 13 ft 6 in in depth and extends 18
feet…The slab contains 7033 cubic yards of concrete…”
In the well of the monument,
the wrought iron frame supports the stone, the staircase and the elevator shaft
using a system of Phoenix columns, which are hollow posts made of panels of
wrought iron riveted together. Phoenix columns are lighter and stronger that
solid wrought iron posts, but it still took nearly 600 tons of iron to build
the stairs and elevator shaft.
Casey wanted the engine for the
elevator to be able to raise heavy loads at a rate of 50 feet per minute. He
contracted with Otis Brothers to manufacture the elevator and its hoisting
machinery. Elisha Otis had invented the safety elevator in the early 1850’s and
demonstrated it at the 1854 World’s Fair.
In August, Captain Davis
inspected the Beaver Dam Quarry near Baltimore and acknowledged that the marble
did not exactly match the Texas Station marble in the original courses. He also inspected quarries in New England and
New York looking for the right stone to use.
The search for marble to match the original was exhaustive, meticulous
and, ultimately, not entirely successful. Nevertheless, Casey was very exacting
in his specifications for marble , which had to be “strong, sound, and free from
flint, shakes, powder cracks, or seams, and must in texture and color so
conform to the marble now built in the monument as not to present any marked or
striking contrast in color, lustre, or shade, when set in the wall.”
By the summer, Casey’s workforce
had swelled to 175 men, most of who were still working on the foundation.
It was in this year that the
question of the design was finally and fully answered, resulting in the iconic
and timeless monument we see today. In February, the American Ambassador to
Italy, George Perkins Marsh, wrote to Senator George Edmunds of Vermont to
express his interest in the memorial. Marsh was, among many other things, a
well-studied expert in Egyptian obelisks. The Senator passed Marsh’s letter to
Casey, who recognized that Marsh’s advice was exactly what Casey needed to
successfully complete his assignment.
Robert Winthrop, who as Speaker
of the House had given the keynote speech at the laying of the cornerstone for
the monument back in 1848, emerged during this time as a champion for Casey and
his revision of Mills’ original design for the monument. Winthrop’s support and
influence were critical to Casey’s success, and directly influenced the final
design of the monument.
Casey began establishing
materials and equipment to start work on the obelisk before he finished with
the foundation. There were three main parts to the obelisk: the marble for the
outside, the granite for the inside, and the iron frame that would support the
memorial. The frame would also hold the
staircase that goes to the top and the elevator and the elevator shaft.
1880
In May, the foundation was
complete; total cost: $94,000. Casey
later wrote, in his own memoir, a brief passage that underscored just how
successful his feat of engineering really was: “Any apparent tendency to
deflection from the vertical was at once checked by undermining on the opposite
side, and thus the mass was swayed at pleasure, until at the end the original
slight deviation was materially corrected.”
In July, Casey advertised for
proposals for supplying 40,000 cubic feet of white marble. Casey originally
awarded the marble contract to John A. Briggs in Sheffield, Massachusetts, but
after getting a great deal of stone that was defective and wrong in color,
after almost a year, he had only enough to raise the monument six feet, he
cancelled the contract with Briggs and awarded his business to Hugh Sisson’s
Beaver Dam quarry. Today Beaver Dam quarry, located in Cockeysville, Maryland,
is a swimming resort.
Casey submitted his (nearly)
final design plans to the Society. Based upon what he learned from his
correspondence with George Marsh, Casey had made some significant changes to
the direction he had received from the Congressional commission.
Marsh had explained to Casey
that the classic Egyptian obelisk was of a height that was equal to 10 times
the length of the base, and that the obelisk tapered so that the base of the
pyramidion cap would be two-thirds to three quarters of the base length on a
side. This meant that the monument would have to be at least 550 feet high,
rather than 525 feet, because the base was 55 feet on each side.
Additionally, the height of the
pyramidion cap had to be the same as the length of the base, and the base of
the cap fit exactly on top of the tapered shaft, with no ledge, overhang or
molding.
Casey had written to Robert
Winthrop, explaining his work on the foundation and requesting his support for
his changed plan. Initially, Winthrop did not agree with Casey’s plan to
incorporate the design elements that George Marsh had suggested, but Casey was
eventually able to convince him that they were essential to making the monument
not simply imposing on the capital skyline, but truly memorable and iconic,
befitting the man it would represent. Winthrop was finally and completely
convinced, and worked to champion Casey’s plan in the Society, the commission,
and Congress and the public at large. In a letter to Congress, Winthrop wrote:
“…a simple, sublime shaft, on a very spot selected by Washington himself…and
rising nearer the skies than any known monument on earth, will be no unworthy
memorial…”
In order to prepare the
long-neglected monument for the resumption of construction, Casey and his men
had to remove the top three courses of marble stones. These had been put in
place during the period when the “Know-Nothings” had control of the society;
the marble stones themselves were mainly pieces that had been previously
rejected by the master mason, and, over the decades of inactivity, water had seeped
into the masonry and forced the facing stones slightly out of place. Casey
began the removal in late July and on August 7th, a small cornerstone laying
ceremony was held at the 150 foot level with President Hayes presiding. The
official party rode the Otis elevator to the top of the obelisk, and Hayes
himself placed a small coin in the mortar just before the cornerstone was put
in place.
By the end of the year, the
marble obelisk reached 172 feet; the iron framework stood close to the 200 foot
mark.
1881
In this year, congress
appropriated $150,000 for the construction. Casey’s crew would reach the 250
foot mark for the marble obelisk by the end of the year.
It was in this year that Captain
Davis left the project to work as General Phillip Sheridan’s aide, and Bernard
Green, a civil engineer and a long-time associate of Casey’s, became Casey’s
primary assistant. Green, with whom Casey had worked back during the Civil War
on coastal fortifications in Maine and other parts of New England, played a
significant role in making the final significant changes to the design of the
monument. Back in 1878, Casey’s plans had been for the pyramidion top of the
obelisk to be made of iron with hammered glass windows. As construction
progressed, the men realized that a wrought iron roof would be too heavy for
the marble obelisk to support, as the marble blocks tapered thinner and thinner
near the top. Additionally, they understood that the roof would corrode and
rust in the weather, staining the white marble facing below. The pyramidion
would have to be made of the same marble of the rest of the monument.
Green drew the plans for the
marble top, and the masons strategized on how they would complete the
construction. The plans would still have to be approved by the Joint Committee,
and there was a long way to go in the construction before they would be ready
to tackle the top.
James Garfield was inaugurated
as President in March. He would serve just until September of the same year,
when he would succumb to an infection after being shot by lawyer Charles
Guiteau in July.
1882
The Monument would reach 340
feet by the end of this year. Almost all of the marble came from the Beaver Dam
Quarry in Cockeysville, with just a small amount coming from Massachusetts and
New York. In his end of year report, Casey estimated that he needed $250,000,
in addition to the balance of roughly thirty thousand dollars that remained, to
complete the monument. This estimate only covered the costs of the monument
itself, including the interior staircase and elevator system, but not the
hoped-for terrace and surrounding grounds.
There was no money for a
lighting system for the interior, either. Electricity was still a new
technology at the time. The first commercial electrical power plant started into
operation earlier in the year, lighting a small part of lower Manhattan.
1883
“To the Honorable Horatio King,
Secretary of the Washington National Monument Society
Dear Sir,
On Friday, the 16th of November, the
masonry and interior iron frame of the monument will have reached the height of
400 feet above the level of the floor of the structure. If that day should be a
pleasant one, it might be agreeable for the members of the Washington National
Monument Society in the city to examine the works; and it gives me pleasure to
extend an invitation to visit the Monument at 10 o’clock that morning (or if
the day should be stormy, the first pleasant day succeeding) at which hour I
shall be on the grounds to welcome the Society.
Very Respectfully,
Your Obedient Servant,
Thomas L. Casey
Engineer in Charge”
At the peak of the construction
effort, Casey employed a force of about 170 men, over 100 of which were
stonecutters, who earned $2.50 to $3.00 per ten-hour day. The delivery of
marble continued to be problematic throughout the construction, but granite,
which was used on the interior of the monument, had fewer issues; the color of
the stone didn’t matter as much and, while Casey was still particular about the
other qualities of the stone, he had no trouble getting all he could use. Almost
all of the granite came from quarries in Maine.
The Supreme Court ruled in this
year that portions of the 1875 Civil Rights Act were unconstitutional, as
private citizens and private businesses have the right to discriminate based
upon race.
1884
On the ninth of August, the
masons set the last piece of marble in place for the shaft, completing it at
the 500 foot level. Below the 450-foot level, the workers could use galvanized
iron clamps, but above that, the walls were thinner and entirely made of
marble. Mortise and tenon joints were used above 470 feet, the level at which
the ribs for the pyramidion started.
The pyramidion would be 55 feet
tall, the same as the length of each side of the base. This conformed to the theory
of Egyptian obelisks that Ambassador Marsh had expounded. There are 262 pieces
of marble in the pyramidion, none more than seven inches thick. They are
supported by the twelve marble ribs that start at the 470 foot level and
converge at the top. A special crane and derrick were built, along with the
scaffolding needed, as the shaft was being completed. Work on the pyramidion
cap started in September and the capstone, a solid piece of marble weighing
about 1.5 tons and over 5 feet in height, was ready to be put in place by late
November.
Though Marsh had recommended
against them, Casey designed and set eight windows near the base of the
pyramidion, so that visitors could look out of them. They each had a piece of
marble for a shutter in a statuary bronze frame that could be closed and
locked, for aesthetic purposes. “When the windows are closed by these shutters,
the pyramidion is much improved in appearance,” Casey said, “and the interior
shaft is protected from storm waters, which would otherwise flow into them from
the roof and flood the upper platforms.”
The capstone apex, which is
about 9 inches high and almost 6 inches on its sides, is made of aluminum,
which at the time was very rare. Since it doesn’t tarnish in the same way that
iron or alloys might, it hasn’t stained the marble, but it does conduct
electricity well enough to serve as part of the lightning rod system for the
monument. The capstone is inscribed with the names of the President, Chester
Arthur and the names of the members of the Joint Commission as well as the
names of Casey, Davis, Green and P.H. McLaughlin, the Master Mechanic. The
words “Laus Deo” also appear, as well as the date the capstone and the apex
were set: December 6, 1884.
On December 6, the capstone of
the monument was set. The Washington Monument was completed.
1885
February 21, the day before
Washington’s Birthday, was the Dedication of the Washington Monument. The event
was presided over by President Chester A. Arthur.
In addition to the congressmen
and senators attending and the representatives of the military, there were many
state governors in attendance as well. Though the weather was cold and there
was snow on the ground, it seemed that everyone in the District was present to
celebrate the long-awaited completion of the Washington Monument.
The pamphlet for the Dedication
has John Sherman, the Senator from Ohio and Chairman of the Joint Commission
for the Monument, as the opening speaker. W.W. Corcoran, the First Vice
President of the Society, and Colonel Thomas L. Casey also spoke. The Grand
Masonic Lodge of the District of Columbia held a Masonic Ceremony and 100-gun
salutes from the Navy Yard, the Artillery Headquarters and Fort Myer were given
as the group walked from the Monument to the Capitol for orations in the Hall
of the House of Representatives. After a prayer from the Reverend S. A. Wallis
of Pohick Church (the Washington family church), an oration by Robert C.
Winthrop, who as Speaker of the House back in 1848, presided over the
cornerstone laying for the Monument, was given. His remarks were followed by
John D. Long, a congressman from Massachusetts, and John W. Daniel from
Virginia. Winthrop’s speech included this:
“…No wonder the
unsightly pile became the subject of pity or derision. No wonder there were
periodical panics about the security of its foundation, and a chronic
condemnation of the original design. No wonder that suggestions for tearing it
all down began to be entertained in many minds, and were advocated by many pens
and tongues. That truncated shaft, with its untidy surroundings, looked only
like an insult to the memory of Washington.
It symbolized nothing but an ungrateful country, not destined as- God be
thanked- it still was, to victory and grandeur and imperishable glory, but
doomed to premature decay, to discord, strife, and ultimate disunion. Its very presence was calculated to
discourage many hearts from other things, as well as from itself. It was an
abomination of desolation standing where it ought not. All that followed of
confusion and contention in our country's history seemed foreshadowed and
prefigured in that humiliating spectacle, and one could almost read on its
sides in letters of blood, "Divided! Weighed in the balance! Found
wanting!"
...An unfinished, fragmentary, crumbling monument to
Washington would have been a fit emblem of a divided and ruined Country.
Washington himself would not have had it finished. He would have desired no
tribute, however imposing, from either half of a disunited Republic. He would
have turned with abhorrence from being thought the Father of anything less than
One Country, with one Constitution and one Destiny.
And how cheering and how inspiring the reflection, how grand
and glorious the fact, that no sooner were our unhappy contentions at an end,
no sooner were Union and Liberty one and inseparable, once more and, as we
trust and believe, forever reasserted and reassured, than this monument to
Washington gave signs of fresh life, began to attract new interest and new
effort, and soon was seen rising again slowly but steadily toward the skies—
stone after stone, course upon course, piled up in peace, with foundations
extended to the full demand of the enormous weight to be placed upon them,
until we can now hail it as complete!
...The Union was nearest and dearest to his great heart. ‘The
Union in any event,’ were the most emphatic words of his immortal Farewell
Address. Nothing less than the Union would ever have been accepted or
recognized by him as a monument commensurate with his services and his fame.
Nothing less ought ever to be accepted or recognized as such by us, or by those
who shall rise up, generation after generation, to do homage to his memory!"
The War Years
Antietam Battlefield
This post will cover the time of the Civil War and Reconstruction. If you haven't seen the post covering the twelve years from the start of the construction in 1848 to 1860, just scroll down to the post titled "Building Begins".
As I've mentioned before, "The Civil War happened!" is the standard answer to the question "Why did it take so long to build the Washington Monument?", but that's at best an incomplete answer that gives the impression that everything stopped in Washington during the war. In fact, there was all kinds of construction taking place in the District of Columbia during the war years. Much of it was because of the war, of course; the ring of fortifications around DC and the expansion of work at the Navy Yard are obvious examples of war-related construction. But there was plenty of other activity as well: Work on the Capitol dome continued throughout the war years, for example, while the unfinished obelisk of the Washington Monument stood a lonely vigil over cattle. It's true!
As I've mentioned before, "The Civil War happened!" is the standard answer to the question "Why did it take so long to build the Washington Monument?", but that's at best an incomplete answer that gives the impression that everything stopped in Washington during the war. In fact, there was all kinds of construction taking place in the District of Columbia during the war years. Much of it was because of the war, of course; the ring of fortifications around DC and the expansion of work at the Navy Yard are obvious examples of war-related construction. But there was plenty of other activity as well: Work on the Capitol dome continued throughout the war years, for example, while the unfinished obelisk of the Washington Monument stood a lonely vigil over cattle. It's true!
1861
In May, Dougherty reported to
the Society that Lieutenant Beckwith, US Army, had presented him with an order
from President Lincoln directing him to use the monument grounds for cattle
belonging to the government and that there were now some forty-five head in the
enclosure.
General Winfield Scott, in
command of the Union forces, had ordered Army troops into Washington to protect
it from incursions from Virginia, just across the river. Throughout the war
years, the monument grounds would serve as part of the logistics support
structure for Union troops, and the unfinished obelisk would stand neglected.
Construction efforts would
instead be centered on fortifications for the city, such as Fort Stevens, in
northwest Washington where present-day Georgia Avenue runs through Brightwood.
The fort and its surrounding earthworks displaced the homes and farms of free
blacks who were the landowners. In all, by early 1864 there would be a complete
37-mile ring around the capital, 68 forts and many artillery batteries and
blockhouses, all linked by trenches and rifle nests. This included the southern
shore of the Potomac and the area that is now Alexandria and Arlington; once
the Federal forces arrived in Washington, they occupied that part of Virginia
in defense of the capital.
A Peace Conference of
representatives of seven of the seceded slave states, including the slave state
Maryland which had not seceded, was held in Washington in February, hosted by
the lame duck President James Buchanan of Pennsylvania. General Scott’s
drilling troops, newly arrived in the city, gave the delegates of the
conference something to consider as they walked to the Executive Mansion to
meet President Buchanan, who pleaded with them to find some compromise.
Just before his inauguration,
Lincoln told a group of supporters in Philadelphia: “…I may say in advance that
there will be no bloodshed (with the seceding states) unless it is forced upon
the government. The government will not use force, unless force is used upon
it.”
Later in the spring, when Fort
Sumter lay under siege in South Carolina, Lincoln was hesitant to recognize
this as the starting point of the war. He took care to inform the governor that
the federal troops he dispatched to relieve the men in the fort were only bringing
food, not ammunition. It made little difference: On April 14, after a day or so of bombardment
directed by the newly formed Confederate army, the Federal forces surrendered
the fort.
On April 19, Confederate
sympathizers in Baltimore caused a riot to prevent Union troops from reaching
Washington. In response, Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus, the right
of a person accused of a crime to appear before a judge before being
incarcerated, for persons detained along the transportation route between
Philadelphia and Washington. This allowed Union forces to capture people
working for the Confederacy and hold them indefinitely without trial.
This was controversial then and
continues to be today. It has been argued by some that in doing this, Lincoln violated
the Constitution. In fact, the Constitution (Article I, Section 9) says,
"The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless
when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”
Lincoln would proclaim, without seeking the
consent of Congress, the writ suspended several times during the war. Whether
this power of suspension is for the Executive Branch to wield, or if it belongs
to the Legislature, is a question the Constitution doesn't specifically address.
If one accepts that the Civil War may have threatened “public safety” and if
responsibility for public safety during wartime is the Commander-in-Chief's,
then it appears that Lincoln was well within his Constitutional bounds.
“Lest there be some uneasiness
as to what is to be the course of government towards the southern states,”
Lincoln said in his July 4th address, “ after the rebellion shall have been
suppressed, the Executive deems it proper to say, it will be his purpose then,
as ever, to be guided by the Constitution and the laws.” Less than three weeks
later, General Scott’s Union forces would be routed by the Confederates in
Manassas, Virginia, also known as Bull Run, less than 50 miles from Washington.
“Suppressing the rebellion” would prove to be easier said than done.
Thomas Casey was transferred to
Portland, Maine, where he was placed in charge of constructing defensive works
on the coast and recruiting engineers to join the Corps of Engineers. He would
remain there until well after the war was over.
1862
For two days in April, Union
and Confederate soldiers battled in a densely wooded area between Pittsburgh
Landing on the Tennessee River and the old Shiloh Church. It was a bloody two
days: nearly 24,000 men had been killed or wounded, with many of the wounded
left to lie unattended on the battlefield to die in the cold, rainy night
between the days’ battles. The leader of the Union forces, U. S. Grant,
realized at the end of the battle that it represented the true character of the
Civil War: the two opposing sides were near equal and no battle would be
completely conclusive; it would be a war of attrition and the victor would be
the side that could bear the brunt of tragedy and the pain of battle. Grant
would take that lesson with him on to the siege of Vicksburg and, at the bitter
end of the war, the taking of Richmond.
Union forces captured New
Orleans soon after the Battle of Shiloh, and Lincoln wrote his view of how
reconstruction of the South might have been in a letter to a Union supporter in
Louisiana: “The army will be withdrawn so soon as such state government can
dispense with its presence; and the people of the state can then upon the old
constitutional terms, govern themselves to their own liking.”
In mid-April, President Lincoln
signed an act abolishing slavery in the District of Columbia. He later signed
the Second Confiscation Act, which allowed for the federal government to seize
all real property of anyone taking up arms against the government. This bill
was quite limited in scope and not often enforced in practice; Lincoln felt
that permanent federal seizure of property was unconstitutional, and demanded a
resolution added to the language of the bill that said that any land seized
would be returned to the heirs of the offender after his death.
By late May, Stonewall Jackson
was pushing into northern Virginia again. The Confederates would again defeat
the Union army in Manassas that summer and Robert E. Lee would cross the
Potomac into Maryland in early September.
The Battle of Antietam, later
that same month, was another ambiguous result. It has the infamous distinction
of being the single bloodiest day, with nearly 23,000 casualties (dead,
wounded, missing/captured), in American war history, beating out both D-Day in
Normandy and the Iwo Jima landing.
The casualties were pretty
evenly distributed and there was no clear victory, though General George
McClellan (whom Lincoln would soon fire) tried to claim it as his as Lee
withdrew his much smaller force back across the Potomac. The North's apparent
advantage did serve a political purpose, though. It allowed President Lincoln
to call it a Union victory and to issue his draft Emancipation Proclamation,
which helped to undercut the rebellion in the South, gaining support from
Northern abolitionists as well as European governments who were closely
observing the War Between the States.
The Emancipation Proclamation
seemed to be a significant departure from Lincoln’s earlier stated designs.
Just a few weeks before he issued the draft Proclamation, he had stated, “My
paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union and is not either to
save or to destroy slavery…What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do
because it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do
not believe it would help the Union.” Lincoln saw the Emancipation Proclamation
as war measure, and wrote it that way. It did not apply everywhere in the
Union, but only in the states in rebellion, and it made no appeal to universal
rights of man, but only to military requirements. In his written address to
Congress in December, Lincoln outlined more completely his plan for gradual
emancipation that would take place over more than thirty years. This protracted
plan, he argued, “spares both races from the evils of sudden derangement; while
most of those whose habitual course of thought will be disturbed by the measure
will have passed away before its consummation. They will never see it.”
Lincoln wrote privately to a
critic of the Proclamation; “You dislike the Emancipation Proclamation, and
perhaps would have it retracted. You say it is unconstitutional. I think
differently. I think the Constitution invests its Commander-in-Chief with the
law of war. The most that can be said--if so much--is that slaves are property.
Is there--has there ever been--any question that by the law of war, property,
both of friends and enemies, may be taken when needed? And is it not needed
whenever taking it helps us, or hurts the enemy?”
1863
The area around the monument
continued to serve as a cattle yard; a hay barn and a slaughterhouse were
constructed on the site, further emphasizing the ignominy into which the
monument had fallen. It was an eyesore in the city and an embarrassment to the
Union. Late in the year, on December
2nd, the Statue of Freedom would be placed on the top of the Capitol dome,
the construction of which had started just a few years before the war broke
out, and would conclude just at the war's end.
Lincoln issued his formal Emancipation
Proclamation on the first day of the New Year. Perhaps the most significant
event of the entire war, the Proclamation set the stage for the Reconstruction
era and ultimately changed the nation forever. Its issuance was quickly
followed by a Union victory in Murfreesboro, Tennessee and the faltering start
of the campaign to take Vicksburg, Mississippi. Vicksburg was strategically
important due to the town's position on the Mississippi. It was, as Jefferson
Davis put it, “the nail head that holds the South’s two halves together” It
would fall to Grant’s siege in July, concurrently with Meade’s victory in
Gettysburg.
The Battle of Gettysburg served
as the high-water mark for the South’s invasion of the North. Encompassing the
drama and emotion of events like Chamberlain’s 20th Maine defending Little
Round Top, the carnage of Devil’s Den, and Pickett’s disastrous charge into the
waiting Northern artillery on Cemetery Ridge, Gettysburg is the center of many
Americans’ understanding about the Civil War.
Lincoln’s address at the dedication of the battlefield cemetery, given
on the 19th of November, ends “that we here highly resolve that these dead
shall not have died in vain, that this nation under God shall have a new birth
of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people
shall not perish from the earth.”
In December, Lincoln issued a
proclamation of amnesty to the southern states that required a minimum of ten
per cent of voters to take an oath of allegiance. This group would then be
allowed to organize a state government, which Lincoln would recognize as
valid. This put the president in
conflict with the congress, who later passed the Wade-Davis bill that required
that each rebelling state be run initially by a military governor, who would receive
allegiance oaths from a majority of voters and then allow a state convention to
be elected, which would repudiate that state’s secession and end slavery as
that body’s first official acts.
Lincoln silently refused to
sign the bill, killing it by pocket veto. The two Radical Republicans that
sponsored the bill, Senator Benjamin Wade of Ohio and Representative Henry
Winter Davis of Maryland, angrily claimed that “the authority of Congress is
paramount” and the President should “confine himself to his executive
duties…and leave political reorganization to Congress.”
Lincoln ignored the bill in
part because it contained language that would have forced each of the rebelling
states to ban slavery before they could be readmitted to the Union, which made
the bill unconstitutional (the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery,
hadn’t even been drafted at this point) in the view of the administration.
Lincoln’s other objection was
that the bill was based upon the idea that the southern states would have to
“rejoin” the Union. Lincoln’s administration never recognized the South’s right
to secede and took the position that the declarations and bills passed by the
seceding states were null. The Union was not at war with treasonous states,
according to Lincoln, it was merely striving to “compel the obedience of
rebellious individuals.” It seems perhaps a too-subtle point from today’s
perspective, but it was an important distinction as Lincoln contemplated
restoring normalcy and prosperity to the entire nation after completion of the
war. The viewpoint of the Radicals in congress who opposed Lincoln was that the
South was a separate and alien nation; this mindset would color much about how
Reconstruction would play out in the absence of Lincoln’s leadership and
influence.
1864
While no work was done on the
Washington Monument, everywhere else in Washington construction was
transforming the city. The war had brought manufacturing, everything from
artillery shells to steamships, to the District, and the work attracted people.
From the docks of the Navy Yard to the Armory to the still-unfinished dome of
the Capitol to the railroad yards in Georgetown, the bustling city was open for
business.
Owing to the victories at
Gettysburg and Vicksburg in 1863, the Union army’s fortunes appeared to have
turned for the better, as well as the political fortunes of Abraham Lincoln.
The hero of Vicksburg, Ulysses S. Grant, came to Washington in March to meet
President Lincoln, receive his commission to Lieutenant General, and hear his
Commander in Chief’s orders to take command of the Union forces and with them
to take the city of Richmond, the rebel capital.
In April, Grant issued his
secret orders for the Union forces, which included Sherman’s combined Armies of
the Cumberland, the Tennessee and the Ohio in Georgia, and the Army of the
Potomac under Meade in northern Virginia. The two separate federal forces would
advance simultaneously, and Meade’s forces would cross the Rapidan and conquer
the rebel capital.
It would be months before that
deed would be completed, and Washington would suffer an attack by General Early
and his Confederate raiders in the meantime: the Battle of Fort Stevens.
President Lincoln himself, who came out to the fort to witness the battle, came
under fire from Confederate snipers as he stood on the parapet observing the
battle. The grass-covered remains of the fort are now a park in Northwest DC. After the war, Early would say, “We didn’t
take Washington, but we scared hell out of Abe Lincoln!”
Fort Stevens
Through the month of May, Grant
moved his forces south towards Richmond. By the end of the month, he took on
the fortified positions of Lee’s Confederates in Cold Harbor, about thirty
miles east of the Southern capital. While most of the fighting came on June 3,
the battle stretched out over a week and the Union forces took heavy losses,
much to Grant’s lasting regret. The end game was set, however, and Lee was
never able to move away from the area around Richmond again. By the 16th of
June, the Union army was crossing the James River south towards Petersburg, to
begin the long siege that would finally end the fighting.
In Tennessee, a small
Confederate victory in April, the brief retaking of Fort Pillow on the
Mississippi, would become an infamous and controversial scandal, the alleged
massacre of surrendering men of the US Colored Troops at the hands of General
Nathan Bedford Forrest’s Confederate soldiers. Forrest himself, though he later
denied having ordered the killing of defenseless men, wrote, “The river was
dyed with the blood of the slaughtered for two hundred yards…It is hoped these
facts will demonstrate to the Northern people that negro soldiers cannot cope
with Southerners.”
Farther south, Sherman’s forces
advanced on Atlanta; the city would fall on the 2nd of September.
Running for re-election against
the general he had fired after Antietam, George McClellan, Lincoln garnered 55
percent of the popular vote and 234 to 21 of the Electoral College votes. He
hoped to use this landslide victory to gain the submission of the Radicals in
congress and put forth his plan for Reconstruction, but there was still
fighting to be done before he could focus on rebuilding. One week after Lincoln’s reelection on
November 9th, Sherman began his March to the Sea, to finally crush the morale
of the rebelling states.
Back in Virginia, General
Sheridan was pursuing Early’s Confederate raiders, the same forces that had
assaulted Washington in the spring. Sheridan won a decisive battle at Cedar
Creek, just west of Front Royal, in October, setting Early and his forces on
the defensive; they would not be able to threaten Washington again.
Late December found Sherman
advancing on Savannah, Georgia. The strategic coastal city would fall on the
21st. W.E.B. Du Bois, the historian and founder of the NAACP, wrote in 1901 of
Sherman’s impact in the South:
“Three characteristic things one might have seen in Sherman's
raid through Georgia, which threw the new situation in deep and shadowy relief:
the Conqueror, the Conquered, and the Negro. Some see all significance in the
grim front of the destroyer, and some in the bitter sufferers of the lost
cause. But to me neither soldier nor fugitive speaks with so deep a meaning as
that dark and human cloud that clung like remorse on the rear of those swift
columns, swelling at times to half their size, almost engulfing and choking
them. In vain were they ordered back, in vain were bridges hewn from beneath
their feet; on they trudged and writhed and surged, until they rolled into
Savannah, a starved and naked horde of tens of thousands.”
The Secretary of War, Edwin
Stanton, traveled to Savannah to meet with black leaders to discuss how the
freedmen would meet their new-found liberty. “The way we can best take care of
ourselves is to have land…till it by our own labor.” It’s difficult to argue
this point, but how to give land to the blacks? Should the former slaveholders
and supporters of secession have their lands seized and turned over to the
blacks? There was the Second Confiscation Act, passed in ’62 that subjected the
property of rebels to seizure, but Lincoln forced the limitation of this act,
which was a war measure, to the lives of the rebels only; the land was to be
returned to their heirs after their deaths. The question of how to provide land
to blacks would not be fully answered for years.
Lincoln continued to develop
and evolve his thinking about the great issue at hand. In a letter to General
Wadsworth, an abolitionist from New York who was serving in the Union army
without pay (and would soon pay the ultimate sacrifice by falling to a fatal
gunshot wound at the Battle of the Wilderness), Lincoln wrote: “How to better
the condition of the colored race has long been a study which has attracted my
serious and careful attention; hence I think I am clear and decided as to what
course I shall pursue in the premises, regarding it a religious duty, as the
nation's guardian of these people, who have so heroically vindicated their
manhood on the battle-field, where, in assisting to save the life of the
Republic, they have demonstrated in blood their right to the ballot, which is
but the humane protection of the flag they have so fearlessly defended.”
1865
On January 31, the Thirteenth
Amendment was passed, abolishing slavery in the United States. The following
day, General Sherman would start moving his Union forces from Savannah to meet
up with the Army of the Potomac and support the siege of Petersburg and
Richmond. Sherman reached Columbia, South Carolina in the middle of February. On
the 17th, after a brief period of artillery fire from the Federals, Columbia,
the birthplace of secession and rebellion, surrendered.
Sherman, who witnessed the
poverty and despair of the blacks that had escaped from the plantations, took
matters into his own hands. His Special Field Order Number 15 set aside the
coastal islands off South Carolina and Georgia and the abandoned lands along
the mouths of the rivers for settlement of the freedmen. The lands were divided
into forty acre plots and nearly 40,000 blacks were settled, though it would
only be a short-lived experiment. After the war, President Johnson had the land
returned to the original owners. Other experiments involving the settlement of
blacks on seized lands were tried as well during this time, but they were all
temporary.
In fact, all plans of the
radicals for giving confiscated property to the freed blacks ultimately failed.
It wasn’t that there was no concern for the economic state of the freed slaves,
or that they wouldn’t have benefited from receiving land from the government,
or not have been industrious enough to make a profit. It was that the entire
idea of redistribution of property from its rightful owner to another,
deserving though that other might be, went totally against the principles upon
which the country had been founded.
As one editorial put it: “A
division of rich men’s lands amongst the landless…would give a shock to our
whole social and political system from which it would hardly recover without
the loss of liberty… [a scheme] in which provision is made for the violation of
a greater number of the principles of good government and for the opening of a
deeper sink of corruption has never been submitted to a legislative body.”
Lincoln’s inauguration was on
the 4th of March, and it appeared that his second term would be spent, not on
war, but on the rebuilding of the nation. “…With malice toward none; with
charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right,
let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds;
to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his
orphan — to do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and a lasting peace,
among ourselves, and with all nations.”
His policy of amnesty seemed to
have been effective, at least to a point.
A pro-Union government had been established in Tennessee and a Whig
Unionist governor had been elected. Louisiana and Arkansas also had Union
loyalist groups ready to form new state governments. In Alexandria, there had
been a rump Virginia legislature and a Unionist state government that had been
recognized by the administration and had operated throughout the war.
Congress created the Freedmen’s
Bureau to provide assistance to both former slaves and white refugees with
food, clothing, shelter, and a means of finding work. The Bureau has been a
target for criticism from the time it was created for corruption, incompetence
and fostering segregation and the general mistreatment of Southern blacks.
Some of that criticism is
undoubtedly well-deserved; there were many examples of the Bureau’s being
complicit in injurious behavior by whites towards blacks. But it also did much
to help the condition of the freedmen; it did in fact provide food and medical
care to hundreds of thousands, and did much to improve the condition of the
former slaves, setting up schools, finding work and supporting individuals with
labor disputes and legal issues.
W.E.B. Du Bois wrote of that
time: “Behind the mists of ruin and rapine waved the calico dresses of women
who dared, and after the hoarse mouthings of the field gangs rang the rhythm of
the alphabet. Rich and poor they were, serious and curious. Bereaved now of a
father, now of a brother, now of more than these, they came seeking a life work
in planting New England schoolhouses among the white and black of the South.
They did their work well. In that first year they taught 100,000 souls, and
more.”
It’s important to remember the
context of the time and the huge social upheaval the end of slavery imposed to
both whites and blacks. Even the most
ardent of supporters of equality for blacks knew that time was needed. Speaking
on the question of voting rights for the freedmen, Thaddeus Stevens, the Radical
abolitionist from Pennsylvania who later led the charge to impeach Johnson,
equivocated: “Whether those who have fought our battles should all be allowed
to vote, or only those of a paler hue, I leave to be discussed in the future
when Congress can take legitimate cognizance of it.”
Lee’s forces retreated from
Petersburg and Richmond in early April and allowed those cities to fall to
Union forces. On April 9th, after a brief skirmish that convinced the
Confederate general that he was finally out-matched, Grant and Lee met in a
house in a town called Appomattox Court House, to discuss terms of General
Lee’s surrender.
On Good Friday just five days
later, John Wilkes Booth, who was part of an extensive conspiracy, shot
President Lincoln in the back of the head as he sat watching a play in Ford’s
Theatre in Washington. The same night, Lewis Powell (who also went by the name
Paine) attacked Secretary of State William Seward and his son Frederick. Seward
survived Powell’s vicious knife attack, though he carried the scars the rest of
his life.
Booth escaped into Virginia,
but was tracked down and shot by Union soldiers in Port Royal less than two
weeks after the assassination of the president. Powell was found at the Surratt
boarding house the day after the attacks, and was tried and hung with the other
conspirators in July.
Jefferson Davis, the former
Confederate president, was taken into custody by Union cavalrymen in Georgia
and spent over three years in prison before being granted amnesty by President
Johnson in 1868.
In the south, state governments
established the “Black Codes” which set very restrictive limits on the meaning
of ‘liberty’ for Freemen. Under the codes, blacks would not be allowed to vote
or to be citizens, nor would they be able to own firearms or move about freely.
Though these Codes would be stricken down the following year, they set the
stage for the segregated, white-dominated south that became the reality after
Lincoln’s vision for healing the country died with him.
The Joint Committee on
Reconstruction was formed on the 13th of December, based upon a resolution
submitted by Thaddeus Stevens. The committee was charged to “inquire into the
condition of the states which formed the Confederate States of America, and
report whether any of them are entitled to be represented in either house of
Congress.”
1866
In February, President Andrew
Johnson presided over the first postwar meeting of the Washington National
Monument Society. “Let us restore the Union, and let us proceed with the
Monument as its symbol…” Despite this support from the highest office in the
land, the Monument would continue to languish in its unfinished state for many
more years.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866,
which was passed over Johnson’s veto to ensure the rights of the emancipated
slaves, anticipated and informed the Fourteenth Amendment by conferring basic
rights of citizenship to all regardless of race, color or former status of
slavery. There was wide-spread
resistance to the Act; groups such as the Ku Klux Klan used terrorism and
violence to oppose it.
In the South, the war’s
aftermath was poverty and a breakdown of civil government and the rule of law.
Some former Confederate soldiers, returning home to desolation and despair,
turned to crime and banditry, and used their military experience to attempt to
reestablish what they saw as the white man’s rightful place in their society’s
order.
Congress also passed a renewed
bill for the Freedmen’s Bureau, again over Johnson’s veto. Opposition to
Reconstruction policies were not limited to the southern states; while many
agreed that slavery was evil, very few held the view that whites and blacks
were equal socially. The anger and turmoil over Reconstruction allowed
politicians a new angle upon which to run for office all over the country:
white supremacy. In the gubernatorial
election in Pennsylvania, a political broadside proclaimed: “The Freedman's
Bureau! An agency to keep the Negro in idleness at the expense of the white
man. Twice vetoed by the President, and made a law by Congress. Support
Congress & you support the Negro. Sustain the President & you protect
the white man!”
In the congressional elections
that fall, Radical Republicans gained two/thirds majority control of both
houses of the congress; Radical Reconstruction was about to begin in earnest.
1867
The Washington Monument Society
resumed its efforts to raise money, but with very little success. The postwar
years were difficult and people focused their attention on seemingly less
trivial matters.
In January, the Congress called
itself into special session, effectively usurping for the first time a power
reserved for the Executive Branch, in order to vote that the first session of
the new congress start in March of that year, rather than wait until the era's traditional
start time of December. This would prevent President Johnson from acting
without the will of the Republican congress. They also sought to limit the
President’s powers by attaching a clause to the Army Appropriation Act that
stated that the Commander in Chief could only issue orders to the military
through the “General of the Army” (who was still Ulysses Grant at the time)
whose headquarters must be in the District, and who could not be sent elsewhere
without the approval of the Senate. This extra-ordinary session also saw Congress
issue the Tenure of Office Act, a bald attempt to prevent Johnson from
replacing Secretary of War Stanton, the last cabinet member from Lincoln’s
administration that sympathized with the Radical Republican view of the
Reconstruction.
The Reconstruction Act of 1867
split the South into 5 military districts, each with its own military governor
from the North. Each state had to have their state constitution approved and
they were required to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, which made citizens of
all the freed slaves, before they were allowed to rejoin the Union. The
language of the preamble was a stark departure from Lincoln’s vision of
reconciliation: “…no legal State governments or adequate protection for life or
property now exists in the Rebel States… [this act would enforce] peace and
good order…in said States until loyalty and republican State governments can be
legally established.”
Nearly 20,000 U. S. troops were
sent to the south to fulfill this mandate. They made up part of the new fabric
of southern life, along with carpetbaggers, Freedmen Bureau agents, scalawags,
freedmen, and the vanquished southern whites. It was an unstable mix and the
violence and criminality was high. In his “Report of the condition of the
South, investigator Carl Shurz wrote:
“The number of murders and assaults perpetrated upon Negroes is very
great; we can form only an approximative (sic) estimate of what is going on in
those parts of the South which are not closely garrisoned, and from which no
regular reports are received, by what occurs under the very eyes of our
military authorities.”
Frederick Douglass wrote an
open letter to Congress which was published in the Atlantic Monthly, appealing
for the legislature to address the question of black suffrage. In it, he succinctly
described the conditions in the South and clearly laid out what the future
would hold:
“… It is plain that, if the right [to vote] belongs to any,
it belongs to all. The doctrine that some men have no rights that others are
bound to respect, is a doctrine which we must banish as we have banished
slavery, from which it emanated… The work of destruction has already been set
in motion all over the South. Peace to the country has literally meant war to
the loyal men of the South, white and black; and negro suffrage is the measure
to arrest and put an end to that dreadful strife…Statesmen, beware what you do...Will
you repeat the mistake of your fathers, who sinned ignorantly? Or will you
profit by the blood-bought wisdom all round you, and forever expel every
vestige of the old abomination from our national borders?"
Thomas Casey was transferred
from Maine to Washington, D.C. to serve as an assistant in the office of the
Chief of Engineers.
1868
As the nation struggled with
Reconstruction, the Washington Monument continued to be neglected. Mark Twain
wrote that “It (the unfinished shaft of the obelisk) is just the general size
and shape, and possesses about the dignity, of a sugar mill chimney.” The next few years would see almost no
activity on anyone’s part to pursue the resumption of the construction effort.
The forlorn, incomplete stump had ceased to be noticed in the daily life of the
District, and nobody paid it the least of thought or attention.
In an episode of political
drama that underscored the enmity left over from the war, Andrew Johnson was
impeached by the House of Representatives, who characterized his firing of the
War Secretary Edwin Stanton as a “high crime and misdemeanor”. He was acquitted
in the Senate by one vote.
The Fourteenth Amendment, which
gave citizenship to all freedmen, was passed by congress but bitterly opposed
in the South. It would be years before it was fully ratified, even as it became
a requirement for rebel states to re-join the Union.
Du Bois wrote about this time:
“...one must not forget an instant the drift of things in the
later sixties: Lee had surrendered, Lincoln was dead, and Johnson and Congress
were at loggerheads; the Thirteenth Amendment was adopted, the Fourteenth
pending, and the Fifteenth declared in force in 1870. Guerrilla raiding, the
ever present flickering afterflame of war, was spending its force against the
Negroes, and all the Southern land was awakening as from some wild dream to
poverty and social revolution."
Thaddeus Stevens, the influential
Radical, died in this year, the first of many Radicals to leave the public
scene with no one behind them to take up the cause of permanent equality and
suffrage for the freedmen.
1869
Ulysses S. Grant was
inaugurated as President in March. His successful campaign was due in part to
the black voters in the South, and he immediately won favor with the Radicals
by selecting Stanton to stay in his Cabinet position as Secretary of War. His
administration would become infamous for corruption and for the beginning of
the white southern “conservative” push to regain political power from the
Radical governments.
Grant lacked the political
skill that was necessary in this time of immense social upheaval; he was
certainly no Lincoln. He was ineffective in dealing with the scandals in which
members of his cabinet became embroiled and he lacked the zeal of the Radical
Republicans to crush the white landholders that resisted the Reconstruction.
This should not have been a surprise from the man who was so humble in victory
at Appomattox.
Much of the criticism against
Grant came from quarters that didn’t want to see a restored Union so much as an
irresistible Federal power, one with no checks from a politically active South.
Despite the problems of his administration, Grant was effective in solidifying
many of the Reconstruction gains sought by the Radicals. He sought consultation
with black leaders, worked to protect suffrage and equal rights for blacks in
the southern states and practically waged war against the Ku Klux Klan, all but
eliminating them during his time in office. Still, the beginnings of the white
South’s “redemption” and the abandonment of the reconstruction effort which
allowed the segregated South to arise were clearly to be found in the early days
of Grant’s presidency.
1870
The June 1st edition of the
Daily National Republican had an article about an interment for Union soldiers
at the Congressional Cemetery on Capitol Hill, even though Arlington National
Cemetery had opened in 1864. The paper also had a recap of the Nationals’
victory over the Olympics in baseball. The Nationals, not the same franchise as
today's Washington team, of course, wouldn’t officially be a professional team
until two years later.
It continued to be a slow time
for those interested in seeing the Monument completed. Not until the Centennial
Celebration got closer did anyone even consider the monument.
The Justice Department, to
support the Attorney General who up to that time had served as a part-time
assistant to the president, was created.
Georgia, after ratifying the
Fourteenth Amendment, would be the final Confederate state to be readmitted to
the Union.
It appeared that the state of
the freedman continued to improve in the start of the new decade. The final
correction to the foundation of the Republic brought about by the Civil War was
completed in the passing by congress of the Fifteenth Amendment, which guaranteed
the right to vote for African-American men. Hiram Rhodes Revels, a Republican
from Missouri, was the first black man elected to the U.S. Senate.
Not all was well, however, in
the cause of the southern blacks. The waste and corruption of the Freedman’s
Bureau and the Reconstruction effort in general, perpetrated by a small but
notorious minority of northern carpetbaggers and southern scalawags, seemed to
vindicate the southern white conservative “Redeemers”, as they came to be known
in the post-Reconstruction South. Racial prejudice, in both the North and the
South, was also widespread and intractable. An article that appeared in the
Atlantic Monthly, the same periodical that gave a stage for Frederick Douglass,
purported to give an informed view of the states of the blacks by a former
Union Army officer, Nathaniel Shaler. He wrote that they were much the same as
they were under slavery, though “perhaps less merry than before, the careless
laugh of the old slave is now rarely heard, for it belonged to a creature who
had never pondered the question of where his next meal was to come from.”
Shaler insisted that those who pushed for equality and suffrage for the black
simply didn’t understand “how thoroughly exotic the Negro is…one cannot
appreciate the difficulties of making him a part of the social system which
fits us… [with his] passions of a mental organization widely differing from our
own.”
Economic interests also
overcame the desire for radical reconstruction of the South. In order for
northern entrepreneurs and investors to do business in the southern states,
there had to be a halt to the violence and uncertainty, and a restoration of
stable local and state governments. It appeared to those interested in
investing in and taking a financial chance on the South, including Republicans,
that the white southern conservatives were the only ones who could set the stage
for economic growth.
1871
The Washington City Canal, of
which Tiber Creek near the Monument grounds was part, had fallen into disuse
over the last twenty years. Never a very pleasant creek, the Tiber had become
an open sewer during the Civil War years. City planners began a project in this
year that created a tunnel to accommodate the water and covered over Tiber
Creek, leaving a small pond between the Monument and the White House.
The Civil Rights Act of 1871,
more commonly known as the Ku Klux Klan Act, was enacted. It was specifically requested by President
Grant and was aimed at stemming the violence and terrorism against blacks in
the South. It allowed the president to suspend habeas corpus and suppress uprisings
in states as he saw fit.
The sentiment against the
radical reconstruction effort continued to grow. Grant’s Secretary of the
Interior, Jacob Cox of Ohio, recommended that the administration seek to gain
the “intelligent, well-to-do, and controlling class” of white southerners as
their allies, essentially a return to Lincoln’s more reconciliatory policies
towards the rebel states that he had envisioned before his death.
In June, the corporations of
the cities of Washington and Georgetown were abolished and a single
Presidentially-appointed government for the entire District of Columbia was
established by the District of Columbia Organic Act. While this is the
beginning of Washington, D.C. as we know it today, it was much later that the
citizens of the district were allowed to elect their own mayor.
1872
U. S. Grant signed the Amnesty
Act into law which restored voting and office-holding privileges to
secessionists (all but about 500 of the military leadership of the CSA). This
Act impacted about 150,000 former CSA soldiers. Despite the fact that this
essentially established an instant voting bloc against him, Grant was
re-elected to office by a wide margin.
Grant ran against Horace
Greeley, the founder of the New York Tribune. Greeley was a staunch
abolitionist but he also believed the rebel states should have been allowed to
secede peacefully; this was only one example of his seemingly
self-contradictory political stances. Perhaps luckily for Greeley, who lost so
emphatically despite having the support of the Democrats and the Liberal Republicans,
he is the only Presidential candidate to die before the Electoral College
ballots were counted.
Liberal Republicans were made
up of one-time radicals who were against the Grant administration and who
thought that the reconstruction effort should be over and the military troops
brought home. They had lost interest in supporting the freedmen, which allowed
their temporary alliance with the Democrats. The Liberal Republican Party
scarcely outlived their candidate, and the membership split and moved (back, in
most cases) into the Democrat and Republican parties.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)